| dc.description.abstract |
Background: Spinal anaesthesia (SA) technique is widely preferred for caesarean
sections due to its safety and effectiveness. However, spinal anaesthesia-induced
hypotension (SAIH) remains a common and serious complication, with global
incidence rates between 50–80% and local rates around 64%. SAIH can lead to adverse
maternal effects like cardiovascular collapse, and fetal risks such as hypoxia and
acidosis. Existing prevention methods, such as fluid loading and prophylactic
vasopressors, are inadequate when used individually. Ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor
antagonist, may mitigate SAIH by inhibiting serotonin-mediated activation of the
Bezold-Jarisch reflex via vagal cardiac receptors. While international data on its
efficacy is controversial, its role at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) also
remains unexplored. This study investigates ondansetron’s potential to reduce SAIH
and enhance maternal outcomes within the MTRH setting.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effect of prophylactic ondansetron on
the incidence of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension and bradycardia, and
vasopressor requirements in pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean sections at
MTRH.
Methods: A randomized, double-blind, control trial was conducted at Moi Teaching
and Referral Hospital (MTRH) involving 194 pregnant women undergoing elective
caesarean sections under spinal anaesthesia. Block randomization and consecutive
sampling were employed. Participants were assigned to two groups (97 each): one
received 4 mg intravenous ondansetron (Group O), and the other received saline (Group
S), both administered 15 minutes prior to anaesthesia. To minimize bias, blinding was
applied to both the anaesthetists administering the intervention and the study
participants. Data on demographics, clinical and surgical outcomes, vasopressor usage,
and neonatal results were collected and analyzed using STATA version 16. Statistical
tests included the two proportions z-test and Mann-Whitney U test, with significance
set at P < 0.05.
Results: SAIH incidence proportion was 85.6%. Group O had lower SAIH occurrence
(77.3%, n=75) compared to group S (93.8%, n=91), P=0.001. Bradycardia was
observed in 14.4% (n=14) of Group S and 8.2% (n=8) of Group O participants, with no
significant difference (P=0.17). Ephedrine was administered more frequently in Group
S (92.8%, n=90) than in Group O (75.3%, n=73), (P<0.001). However, the median total
dose was comparable between the groups; 18.0 mg (IQR: 12.0–24.0) in Group S and
18.0 mg (IQR: 12.0–30.0; P ˃0.99). Phenylephrine was administered at almost similar
frequencies in Group S (10.3%, n=10) and Group O (7.2%, n=7; P=0.446), though the
total dose was significantly higher in Group S (200 mcg) than Group O (100 mcg;
P=0.023). In addition, occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and shivering was significantly
less in Group O (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Prophylactic 4mg IV ondansetron is effective in reducing the occurrence
of SAIH, the vasopressor requirement, and the total dose of vasopressors. Prophylactic
ondansetron has no effect on the occurrence of bradycardia.
Recommendations: Prophylactic administration of 4 mg IV ondansetron 15 minutes
before spinal anaesthesia should be considered for elective caesarean sections at MTRH
to reduce the incidence of SAIH and vasopressor requirement. The Anaesthesia
Department should consider adding ondansetron in the prevention and management
protocol of SAIH. |
en_US |