Abstract:
The genus Pratylenchus encompasses a diverse group of nematodes with significant implications in Agriculture. Only 24 Pratylenchus spp. have been reported in Africa to date. However, cryptic
biodiversity within the genus Pratylenchus exists, suggesting actual diversity of Pratylenchus nematodes maybe underestimated. Undescribed and cryptic species could complicate nematode
management strategies, quarantine, biodiversity conservation and food security efforts. Because Pratylenchus spp. vary in pathogenicity and reproduction, accurate characterization is essential in
agriculture and could have implications on crop production.
Fig. 4
BOF
Fig 3 Bayesian inference phylogenetic relationships within the genus Pratylenchus of Clade VI (Subbotin et
al., 2008; Troccoli et al., 2016) generated from the A) 18S rDNA and D2-D3 of 28S rDNA and B) ITS rDNA
gene sequences. New sequences of Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov. are indicated in bold.
A
Phylogenetic analysis
A B
Fig. 3
Table 1. Comparison of Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov. with morphologically similar species
Morphological comparisons
In conclusion, pathogenicity studies, host susceptibility and life cycle studies show that Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat.
nov. is an important agricultural pest with a wide distribution and this study provides a comprehensive understanding of its
interactions with various hosts. This underscores the need for improved surveillance and management strategies of this
nematode to curb further spread.
Morphological analysis
Fig. 1 Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov.
lindrawings. (a, b) Female anterior region, (c)
en face view, (d) entire body of female, (e–g)
variation in lateral lines (e, juvenile mid-body; f,
g vulva region), (h–k) variation in tail shape.
Fig.2 Light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photographs of
Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov. (a–d) Female anterior and pharyngeal
regions, (e–g) SEM images of female head region, (h) female reproductive
system, (i) entire female and juvenile body, (j) lateral field in female mid-body,
(k) vulva region, (l, m) SEM images of female vulva region, (n–r) variation in tail
shape and tail tip of female, (s–u) SEM images of female tail.
Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov., previously misidentified as P. bolivianus due to
sequence similarities despite molecular and morphological differences
Pathogenicity and Lifecycle
Table 3. Reproductive potential and susceptibility index of
various crops to Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov.
Fig. 6 Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov. exihibits a life
cycle of similar length to Pratylenchus penetrans in carrot
discs, but demonstrates considerably greater reproduction
Fig. 5 Acid fuchsin-staining revealed the presence of
Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov. within the roots
of OKHALE-1 and KNE1034 finger millet genotypes
Fig. 4.
Pratylenchus
vandenbergae
stat. nov
considerably
reduced shoot
and root weight
in OKHALE-1 but
not KNE1034
Pratylenchus populations were isolated from finger millet in Kenya and from maize, potato, tomato and soybean from South Africa. Based on light microscopy and sequences of D2-D3 of 28S rDNA
and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of rDNA, these populations were found to be conspecific and molecularly identical to P. teres teres, and to P. teres vandenbergae based on sequences of D2-D3
of 28S rDNA and the heat shock protein Hsp90. However, due to discernible morphological differences compared to the original description of P. teres and their distinct geographical distribution,
Pratylenchus vandenbergae stat. nov. is recognized as a separate species.