DSpace Repository

A qualitative pilot study exploring the acceptability of a peer provider delivered substance use brief intervention from the perspective of youth in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jaguga, Florence
dc.contributor.author Aalsma, Matthew C
dc.contributor.author Enane, Leslie A
dc.contributor.author Turissin, Matthew
dc.contributor.author Kwobah, Edith Kamaru
dc.contributor.author Apondi, Edith
dc.contributor.author Barasa, Julius
dc.contributor.author Kosgei, Gilliane
dc.contributor.author Olando, Yvonne
dc.contributor.author Ott, Mary A
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-10T09:40:03Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-10T09:40:03Z
dc.date.issued 2025-06-20
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9930
dc.description A qualitative pilot study exploring the acceptability of a peer provider delivered substance use brief intervention from the perspective of youth in Keny en_US
dc.description.abstract Abstract Background Substance use disorders are prevalent among youth in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), yet treatment resources are scarce. Peer provider delivered brief interventions (BIs) represent an affordable and potentially scalable strategy for addressing youth substance use disorders. The goal of this study is to assess the acceptability of a peer provider delivered substance use BI from the perspective of youth in Kenya. Methods We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with youth participants (n = 25) to explore acceptability of a substance use BI. Youth were participants in a two-arm mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the feasibility of a peer provider delivered single-session substance use BI for youth aged 15–24 years with moderate-risk substance use. The semi-structured interviews were conducted three months after the BI was delivered and were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Results We interviewed 25 of 38 participants in the BI arm, 18 males and 7 females; 15 were ages 18–24 years, and 10 ages 15–17 years. Affective attitude: Most youth reported that they enjoyed the session content and enjoyed interacting with the peer provider. Burden: Most youth felt that it was easy to understand the session and participate in it. Perceived effectiveness: Most of the youth perceived the intervention to be effective in helping them reduce substance use and improve their well-being. Ethicality: All youth perceived that the counselling session fit in with their goals and values. Intervention coherence: Most youth understood the overall goal of the intervention. They reported that the goal of the intervention was to help youth stop substance use, and to bring about behavior change. Opportunity costs: Some youth reported that they had to forgo other activities to attend the session, such as work, school, sports, gaming, visiting family, or house chores. Self-efficacy: Most youth felt confident about being able to cut down or stop using substances following the intervention en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.subject A qualitative en_US
dc.subject pilot study en_US
dc.subject exploring en_US
dc.subject the en_US
dc.subject acceptability en_US
dc.subject of en_US
dc.subject a en_US
dc.subject peer provider en_US
dc.subject delivered en_US
dc.subject substance en_US
dc.subject use brief en_US
dc.subject intervention en_US
dc.subject from en_US
dc.subject the en_US
dc.subject perspective en_US
dc.subject of en_US
dc.subject youth en_US
dc.subject in en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title A qualitative pilot study exploring the acceptability of a peer provider delivered substance use brief intervention from the perspective of youth in Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account